Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 1.13
    • Component/s: Other
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar issues:
      CURRIKI-362Implement correct action menu for view/edit asset in editor
      CURRIKI-2116update the Trans for the CB's add menu
      CURRIKI-2036Cancel returns user to Add Resource choice from left menu.
      CURRIKI-3823No Action links appearing in Favorites tab
      CURRIKI-2114remove the template option from the Currikulum Builder's add menu
      CURRIKI-2115update the text at the top of the CB's add menu and add a file dialogs as per the spec
      CURRIKI-5355Add PD Workshop to left menu
      CURRIKI-5999Add Newsletter to WordPress Home Page Member Menu
      CURRIKI-2947Left menu > Under Contribute >Click Add a Resource link.Curriki dialog window will open up.Design issue noted
      CURRIKI-517Add learning Resource from main site (Left menu) does not work now (No "Information" dialog is presented.)

      Description

      We should add a few actions to ease up quick jump from within a Curriki instance.

      e.g.

      • if viewing a user profile, edit that user-object
      • if viewing any page, see that same page in beta, current, prod...
      • ...

        Activity

        Hide
        Paul Libbrecht added a comment -

        Please add your suggestions.
        paul

        Show
        Paul Libbrecht added a comment - Please add your suggestions. paul
        Hide
        Joshua Marks added a comment -

        I am not sure about viewing the same on beta, current etc. That is just a URL change.

        However, seeing and editing a user's validaiton info and validating or invalidating a user would be helpful.(I suppose #1, edit user in object editor woudl do that)

        Adding a payment to a user (perhaps, but that woudl be a new funtion?).

        Send an e-mail to a user and/or markeing them as spam or bad actors.

        Links to key elements of the Admin page? (Which ones?)

        Show
        Joshua Marks added a comment - I am not sure about viewing the same on beta, current etc. That is just a URL change. However, seeing and editing a user's validaiton info and validating or invalidating a user would be helpful.(I suppose #1, edit user in object editor woudl do that) Adding a payment to a user (perhaps, but that woudl be a new funtion?). Send an e-mail to a user and/or markeing them as spam or bad actors. Links to key elements of the Admin page? (Which ones?)
        Hide
        Joshua Marks added a comment -

        Perhaps also deleting a user too.

        Show
        Joshua Marks added a comment - Perhaps also deleting a user too.
        Hide
        Paul Libbrecht added a comment -

        reading this file, because the style was broken, I realized there was already an edit-object and an edit rights when the user was superadmin.
        I've now made it for any admin.

        This also implies that persons such as the editors will be offered to edit WYSIWYG which is probably dangerous and breaking. Do we want to prevent this?
        Do we want to make two levels of admins?

        I think the rights editor, however, should be suppressed because it is too slow to start.
        Agree?

        paul

        Show
        Paul Libbrecht added a comment - reading this file, because the style was broken, I realized there was already an edit-object and an edit rights when the user was superadmin. I've now made it for any admin. This also implies that persons such as the editors will be offered to edit WYSIWYG which is probably dangerous and breaking. Do we want to prevent this? Do we want to make two levels of admins? I think the rights editor, however, should be suppressed because it is too slow to start. Agree? paul
        Hide
        Joshua Marks added a comment -

        We have an editor role and I think two levels as admin (Community Admin and System or Super Admin) might be best.

        I am not clear what you mean by "Suppress the rights editor"? Please clarify what and where.

        Show
        Joshua Marks added a comment - We have an editor role and I think two levels as admin (Community Admin and System or Super Admin) might be best. I am not clear what you mean by "Suppress the rights editor"? Please clarify what and where.
        Hide
        Paul Libbrecht added a comment -

        Please try the rights-editor, it failed to load with me.
        Do you agree the WYSIWYG editor should not be presented?

        Thus far I've been considering the role of global-admin only.
        Superadmin requires a special login that is not used (and is not config-activated), therefore I disabled using it.

        However, it makes sense to use the editor role, offering wiki-editor, attachments-editor, and objects editor.

        paul

        Show
        Paul Libbrecht added a comment - Please try the rights-editor, it failed to load with me. Do you agree the WYSIWYG editor should not be presented? Thus far I've been considering the role of global-admin only. Superadmin requires a special login that is not used (and is not config-activated), therefore I disabled using it. However, it makes sense to use the editor role, offering wiki-editor, attachments-editor, and objects editor. paul
        Hide
        Joshua Marks added a comment -

        Closing this as fined (At least in part) for member management tool. Others can be added as new items.

        Show
        Joshua Marks added a comment - Closing this as fined (At least in part) for member management tool. Others can be added as new items.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Paul Libbrecht
            Reporter:
            Paul Libbrecht
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:
              Date of First Response: