The 0.95beta pom is kind of messy... The batik dependencies are using a wrong group name ("batik" instead of "org.apache.xmlgraphics"), a dependency on the wrong version of avalon. These problems should be reported to someone handling the fop releases.
And if we want to upgrade to batik-1.7, too, then we must ask someone to also publish the batik-rasterizer project, as it is the only one missing from the 1.7 release, and we're using it.
Sergiu Dumitriu added a comment - 14/May/08 01:01 The 0.95beta pom is kind of messy... The batik dependencies are using a wrong group name ("batik" instead of "org.apache.xmlgraphics"), a dependency on the wrong version of avalon. These problems should be reported to someone handling the fop releases.
And if we want to upgrade to batik-1.7, too, then we must ask someone to also publish the batik-rasterizer project, as it is the only one missing from the 1.7 release, and we're using it.
Sergiu Dumitriu added a comment - 14/May/08 01:42 I have a working core pom.xml, but it is ugly (lots of excludes and unneeded dependencies because of the problems in the fop pom).
Task
Closed
Major
Upgrate the apache-fop dependency
And if we want to upgrade to batik-1.7, too, then we must ask someone to also publish the batik-rasterizer project, as it is the only one missing from the 1.7 release, and we're using it.