XWiki Platform

Introduce display macro

Details

  • Type: New Feature New Feature
  • Status: Closed Closed
  • Priority: Major Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • Affects Version/s: 3.3
  • Fix Version/s: 3.4-milestone-1
  • Component/s: Rendering
  • Labels:
    None
  • Tests:
    Unit
  • Difficulty:
    Unknown
  • Similar issues:
    XWIKI-6060Create Display macro
    XWIKI-8262Introduce translation macro
    XWIKI-8793Introduce LUA script macro
    XWIKI-7524Add new {{documents}} Macro to list all documents in a livetable
    XWIKI-5957New permission check introduced in 2.5 forbids macros which need programming rights in subwikis
    XWIKI-4157Use the macro name instead of macro id when displaying macro information
    XWIKI-6429Code macro is not displayed correctly in IE6
    XWIKI-3186Display inserted macros
    XWIKI-5565Names of the parameters for wiki macros are not displayed
    XWIKI-6702Formula macro fails displaying too large formulas

Issue Links

depends on

Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. XRENDERING-171 Introducing new metadata in to indicate the base reference to use to resolve references

  • Major - Major loss of function.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct and has been pushed to production. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.
is duplicated by

New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. XWIKI-6060 Create Display macro

  • Major - Major loss of function.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct and has been pushed to production. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.
relates to

Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. XWIKI-7516 Documents included using the reference parameter of the include macro don't appear in the list of included pages

  • Major - Major loss of function.
  • Closed - The issue is considered finished, the resolution is correct and has been pushed to production. Issues which are not closed can be reopened.

Activity

Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Hide
Permalink
Sergiu Dumitriu added a comment -

I was proposing the more explicit name includeDisplayer instead of display in http://markmail.org/message/azbetnd6tcg7c2mx

Show
Sergiu Dumitriu added a comment - I was proposing the more explicit name includeDisplayer instead of display in http://markmail.org/message/azbetnd6tcg7c2mx
Hide
Permalink
Vincent Massol added a comment - - edited

I really really prefer "display" since it hasn't much to do with inclusion and I find that having two macros starting with the same prefix makes it hard to understand what to use (as we had with includeTopic, includeInContext and includeForm). "includeDisplayer" doesn't mean anything at all to me. What's a displayer? Why would the user want to include a displayer?

In addition the module macro is the display module so it makes sense to name the macro accordingly or it would mean that the display module is not well named and we need to fix that.

Show
Vincent Massol added a comment - - edited I really really prefer "display" since it hasn't much to do with inclusion and I find that having two macros starting with the same prefix makes it hard to understand what to use (as we had with includeTopic, includeInContext and includeForm). "includeDisplayer" doesn't mean anything at all to me. What's a displayer? Why would the user want to include a displayer? In addition the module macro is the display module so it makes sense to name the macro accordingly or it would mean that the display module is not well named and we need to fix that.

People

  • Assignee:
    Thomas Mortagne
    Reporter:
    Thomas Mortagne
Vote (0)
Watch (0)

Dates

  • Created:
    Updated:
    Resolved:
    Date of First Response: